Anne Leflot & Gerald D. Smith, Jr.
Between November 2020 and February 2021, students from the three schools met once a month via Zoom for an exploration and comparison of their respective neighborhoods, with the goal of unveiling the different systems (political, social, environmental, architectural, etc.) that structure their lives. Through a variety of virtual making activities and protocols, they were able to identify the differences and similarities of their neighborhoods, name the systems that structure them, identify some issues of pressing concern, and imagine and design possible solutions. Each learning cohort–WIS, STM, & Gambetta–also had the opportunity to partake in a neighborhood walk and mapping of their own neighborhood. The students worked together to explore the complexities of their individual neighborhoods and, in turn, worked to come up with their own ideal neighborhoods: its parts, the people involved, and the powers at play within them. Through the analysis of their neighborhoods, and the creation of their own, students had the opportunity to explore not only the phenomena of segregation, gentrification, resilience, and social mixing, but also the major systems/forces that are at the roots of these phenomena.
There were many adaptations of the project as we worked to be sure that the learning experiences were rich. The virtual space had many complexities–including creating cross-cultural community norms over technology–and we found ourselves recreating components based on student feedback for learning and understanding. The participants came from different backgrounds and perspectives, but as we worked together, a sense of community was built to discuss complex findings from neighborhood mapping and exploration. At times, we found a need for a lot of educator probing for some groups in order to foster conversation. The complexities of being online, the unfamiliarity with JxD protocols, and the context of the pandemic all presented challenges, but they also opened up opportunities for students to collaborate across cultures and learning communities. We noted profound capacity for resilience and creativity in the students, particularly when they were designing their own neighborhoods. When we had to shrink the timeline, it forced the students to be very intentional about the selections and answers they had to provide.